![mcpixel ludum dare mcpixel ludum dare](http://mcpixel.net/shots/shot10.png)
These little ones aren't serious, they aren't what I want to be doing." I participated in two, as well as some student-run ones, and figured, "ah, I think I've done enough jams, I should do bigger games.
![mcpixel ludum dare mcpixel ludum dare](http://sos.gd/ponk/ponksrc.png)
I had a similar experience to yours - when I was in college. Instead shift the emphasis to creating, polishing and even marketing simple games. I also don't think that it has any value for the game development community or people who love games for the reasons I've already outlined. I did enjoy it yes, but I don't think I would do it again. You could say that I already answered my question when I said I enjoyed participating. Raising the bar for entires would cut the numbers dramatically so it would be win-win. Instead of Ludum Dare squandering the significant amount of attention is generates on 1000s (it broke 1000 entries in LD23) of shovel-ware games, why not encourage and then help promote a smaller number of reasonably well produced games. A simple game has some chance of being polished in that amount of time.
#Mcpixel ludum dare free#
A month is still insanely short, especially assuming most could only put in their free time, but it's infinitely better than 48 hours.
![mcpixel ludum dare mcpixel ludum dare](http://sos.gd/bundle/gfx/shot/10.5.png)
Here's a better challenge for the game development community: Make a game in a month that makes (over its life) $1,000 - $10,000. The world doesn't need any more games worth $1. This October challenge reemphasizes the misplaced focus of Ludum Dare: make something overnight that makes just $1.
#Mcpixel ludum dare android#
If you look at the industry as a whole there is an abundance of poorly made games (largely made in Flash, though iOS, Android and most other platforms have their share) that do nothing for the developers or the limited number of people that play them. My observation is that if Ludum Dare is about creating games - if nothing else than for the sake and love of games - then the format is completely wrong. The rest (based on an admittedly small sample) simply weren't games, at least not yet. There was one other game that I played (I played twenty or so to vote on them) that was fun to play. The winning game I thought was innovative and I actually played it for more than 10 minutes. I produced a pretty horrible game with the time I had allotted but did enjoy having a reason to screw up my schedule and drink too much coffee. I participated once in the main competition for LD23. I'm not really sure what the point of Ludum Dare is. This is general to Ludum Dare (not to this challenge) but since it's infrequently discussed here I thought I'd post.